I was recently invited to be a guest on the radio show and podcast “Watch the Media with John Shrader.” The program airs on the University of Nebraska-Lincoln campus radio station and the podcast of the show can be heard on SoundCloud.
John had some interesting questions and I thought I’d share them, along with my answers in this week’s blog article.
What is the State of Terrestrial Radio?
If we look at the topline number of how many Americans listen to terrestrial radio today versus the last ten years or so, that number is remarkably stable. Unfortunately, what has changed are the TSL (Time Spent Listening) and PUR (Persons Using Radio) numbers. They’ve been in a steady decline since 2007. That’s 11-years of erosion.
What’s not pretty is the accompanying loss of revenue that comes with losing 30% of your TSL.
Radio revenues today are characterized with such phrases as “flat is the new up.”
In 2017, U.S. commercial radio’s over-the-air income declined 2% year-over-year, according to BIA Advisory Services’ Q1 2018 “Investing in Radio Market Report.”
In should be noted that, the same report showed that radio stations reported a 9.7% increase in online revenues over the same period.
Radio Revenue Recent History
During the 1990s, ratings and ad revenue rose rapidly. According to the Radio Advertising Bureau, industry revenues grew from around $11 Billion per year to nearly $20 Billion between 1994 and 2000. After 1996, revenues grew by double digit percentages every year until 2001.
PBS reported that “The collapse of advertising budgets that came in 2001 after 9/11 hit radio hard, cutting revenues by 8-percent that year to $18.4 Billion.”
In February 2005, then Viacom (today CBS) President Leslie Moonves told the L.A. Times this his top priority was returning the business to a “growth path.” Moonves recently sold off all of CBS radio stations to Entercom.
2017 Radio Revenues
In 2017, radio revenues ended at $13.87 Billion; not exactly a “growth path.”
BIA SVP and Chief Economist Mark Fratrik summarized the situation for American radio this way:
“Revenues are growing for broadcasters online but not over-the-air. We do not expect over-the-air advertising revenue of U.S. radio stations to grow much this year or in the near future. There is an unprecedented number of new audio entertainment and information sources and new advertising platforms competing with radio, including many that are unregulated. It’s an aggressive environment that competes for audiences with local radio.”
Who are Radio’s Listeners and Where do They Listen?
In general, today’s radio listeners are on the backside of Everett Rogers “Diffusion of Innovation Curve.” They are part of the Late Majority and Laggards.
The primary way people access radio today is in their car. But by 2020, it is estimated that 75% of the cars sold will be connected to digital services.
Today’s heaviest radio listeners are reported to be Black or Hispanic.
Radio’s best listeners tend to be employed full-time versus unemployed. That’s great news for radio sales people to share.
What’s alarming is the fact that recent research showed that 29% of all American households don’t have a single AM or FM radio in them and even more alarming, 18-34 year old households are now at the tipping point of radio ownership. 50% of those household don’t have a single AM or FM radio in them. That probably explains how monthly online audio listening reportedly increased from 5% in 2000 to 64% in 2018.
Edison Research has more HERE
What’s the Future for Podcasting?
Podcasting is still growing. About 26% of people over the age of 12 have listened to any podcast in the past 30-days. However, 36% of Americans still don’t have a clue as to what podcasting even is. So, it would appear there’s a lot of growth potential.
Great podcasts, like great radio personalities, tell great stories.
Something to watch is Amazon. It laid off its entire original podcast staff in August.
What’s the Impact of Smart Speakers on Radio?
Tom Webster at Edison Research says “smart speaker adoption is the fastest tech adoption we’ve ever tracked in the Infinite Dial research. It went from 7% to 18% in a year.”
Smart speaker growth isn’t slowing and these new devices are replacing radios in the home.
I got my first Amazon Echo for Christmas 2017. By the end of Q1 2018, I owned three of them. 100% of my in-home radio listening now occurs via a smart speaker.
These things are addictive.
65% of people who own a smart speaker say they wouldn’t give them up.
What’s Radio’s Future?
People my age grew up with radio. Our parents controlled our home’s only television back in the 60s/70s. Radio was a way we could escape and connect with people our own age and the music of our generation.
Much as we created radio for our generation of listeners, today’s future broadcasters will need to mold it for their generation.
We are living in the days of a communications revolution. Not since the invention of the printing press and movable type has the world of communication been so rocked by change. Revolutions are messy, the future is not always clear, major disruption is par for the course.
New ways of communicating are being created.
Radio, as we knew it, is not coming back.
ON DEMAND
We now live in an ON DEMAND world. It has changed the way we use all forms of mass media. People going forward will want what they want, when they want it.
Netflix created the new phenomena of binge-watching TV shows. I do that now too. I also binge-listened to the podcast SERIAL on a long car drive after that weekly podcast had completed season one.
What Won’t Change?
What we know is that people will always be drawn to great story telling. Our brains are wired for stories. We also know that people will want to be connected to others like themselves.
Dan Mason puts it this way, radio is all about community and companionship.
I don’t see that changing, do you?
It’s true, radio as we know it is going away. But radio as we *don’t* know it is doing well.
Stations that broadcast entertaining, compelling programming are extending their reach through online streaming. Podcasts provide similarly compelling programs on-demand. SiriusXM, currently the only satellite radio system of its type in the U.S., has some of the best “local” music radio in the country on its ’60s and ’70s channels, and is the default source for many of us who enjoy talk radio in our cars.
And speaking of talk radio, the news-talk and sports-talk formats have revitalized AM and are now gaining strength on the FM band — including HD channels and repeaters. I don’t exactly welcome repeaters, as they tend to reduce the range of regular FM stations in some areas, but at least they offer what the audience apparently wants: AM programming with FM clarity and freedom from static in their local areas.
How can terrestrial radios, as we knew it, compete? As always, by combining programming that people actually want with the latest, best technology available to broadcasters. Political talk radio on FM, when it dares, could even pan the microphones during interview programs, left for liberals and right for conservatives; this could give FM talkers a slight perceived edge over their AM siblings. (Too bad quadraphonic FM never took off; listeners could hear the host “in the front seat” and callers “in the back seat” during commutes.)
Electronic gimmickry won’t ever sell programming beyond the short term, but it can — like other good audio processing technology, properly used — enhance it. *Clean* audio beats trickery every time, and good programming beats both.
The big, powerful, well-funded stations are already giving the listeners a reason to tune in; that’s why they are well funded by profits. The small, shoestring operations will have to innovate or disappear — or sell to the conglomerates, just as mom-and-pop cable systems in small towns have done. No station can survive by giving the audience what it doesn’t want or care about. Mediocre radio can survive only in the absence of something better, regardless of market size.
But “the best” in a category isn’t necessarily limited to a single station in any given market. Remember when most cities had two or more popular Top40 stations, or perhaps Country stations, or name-your-format? Perhaps the 50kw station had the range, while the 5kw station had better deejays or greater presence in the community? It’s possible for any station, if well operated by broadcast professionals, to succeed, and even out-perform, *all* the competition in its market.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thank You Walter for all you wrote and adding to the conversation.
-DT
LikeLiked by 1 person